[under construction, and still in a very early state of development!]
____________________________________________
(a) Exposition of the issue; along with ...
(b) Examples; and never without ...
(c) Motivation ('Why should THIS be relevant to a philosopher?')
____________________________________________
The issue of an appropriate 'logic' course would be proper (rational, reasonable) thinking and arguing. Accordingly, the subject matter of an appropriate course in 'philosophical logic' would be the art of thinking and arguing in philosophical work. But what, quite in particular, does this mean for the schedule of such a course? The links on the left hand side are supposed to cover the most significant issues of Real Logic (hints at significant issues missing here are welcome).
In most cases, the issues correspond to mistakes in the thinking and writing of prominent philosophers, and in the final version, real examples of these mistakes will be given in each case. (This promise can suitably serve as a test for the significance of each topic ...)
[xxx]
Any suggestions, corrections, hints related to this material in progress are welcome!