- Home
- What is 'Logic'?
- Logical Issues
- Elementary Semantics
- (Types of) Understanding
- *(Types of) Definition
- Varieties of 'Implication'
- The Role of 'Proofs'
- Propositional Logic, Deontic Logic
- 'Explanation'
- Falsification
- Concluding
- Types of Circularity
- Modality
- Category Mistakes
- 'a priori', 'analytic', 'contingent'
- 'Formal Logic'
- Common Language in Philosophy
- Definition
- Logical Flaws in Literature
- Schlick's (1936) definitions of 'meaning'
- Quine's (1951) rejection of 'analytic truths'
- Moore's (1903) 'analysis' of 'good'
- (v) Frege's (1892) definition of 'Bedeutung'
- ((v)) Lewis' (1970) re-definition of "true"
- (v) Quine's (1951) re-definition of "analytic"
- (v) Davidson's (1967) discussion of a fictive 'Frege' theory
- 'Formal Logic'
- Contact
- Notizblock
- Elementary Semantics
- (Types of) Understanding
- *(Types of) Definition
- Varieties of 'Implication'
- The Role of 'Proofs'
- Propositional Logic, Deontic Logic
- 'Explanation'
- Falsification
- Concluding
- Types of Circularity
- Modality
- Category Mistakes
- 'a priori', 'analytic', 'contingent'
- 'Formal Logic'
- Common Language in Philosophy
[under development]
Important question: Which are the three most spectacular contributions to philosophical knowledge which were only made possible by, or in fact caused by, the use of formal logic? (Answer: In fact there are none. The truth is: Formal logic is largely useless for philosophical practice!)
List of terms defined in FLL
What FLL are good for
What FLL cannot achieve
Pseudo-precision; pseudo-scientificity
o examples of (importantly) unclear formal statements
o examples of ambiguous formal statements
o examples of dispensable formal statements